|
|
Why do Mission? |
|
|
One
of the questions often asked by Christians over the last 30 or so years
has been the question, "Why should we still be sending people out to preach
the gospel to other nations and cultures?" Sometimes the question is asked
in a slightly more negative way: e.g. "Do we have the right to try to change
the way people worship God? Do we have the right to go into other cultures
and tell them they're doing it the wrong way?" That's because part of our
reaction to our colonial past has been to fear the perpetuating of colonial
attitudes through missionaries taking their western culture to other countries,
along with the gospel. And you can understand why those sorts of questions
arise when you see African and Asian and South American church leaders dressing
up in clothes that were designed to keep you warm in freezing English Churches
in the middle of winter. |
|
|
But
is that enough reason to stop taking the gospel to other nations, to people
who haven't yet heard it? And even forgetting other nations, people want
to know do we have a right to share the gospel with our fellow Australians
who all have their own sets of beliefs and values? These are the sorts of
questions that people are asking, even some Christians are asking, particularly
those of a more liberal bent. They want to know whether in this multi-faith
society of ours we still have a reason to go and share the gospel with others?
|
| |
Well
that's the first of two questions we're going to address today as we look
at this passage from Acts 13. It's interesting that those sorts of questions
never seem to arise in the New Testament. Despite the fact that theirs was
just as multicultural and certainly more multi-faith than ours, they had
no hesitation in sharing the gospel with those who hadn't heard it. So why
is that? |
| |
Well,
first of all, I guess, because they had Jesus' direct command, his last
words to them, still ringing in their ears: "Go into all the world and preach
the gospel." And as you saw a couple of weeks ago when Michael preached
on Acts 11, there was an inevitability about the spread of the gospel as
people moved out from Jerusalem and simply talked to their neighbours about
this new found faith. They couldn't help themselves, could they? They just
had to tell people this amazing message of a man who'd died and then risen
again. |
| |
What
we find here is that as the church grows God steps in to make sure that
it grows even faster. God's Spirit comes to the Christians in Antioch and
gives them an even greater impetus for sharing the gospel. He tells them
to send out Saul and Barnabas for the specific ministry of sharing the gospel
with the wider world. |
| |
Now
you could ask the question whether they'd eventually have thought of this
by themselves. Perhaps they might have. But then maybe they wouldn't. Remember
that Saul had been brought to Antioch by Barnabas to teach the new converts,
particularly the Gentile converts, about their new faith. And we could probably
assume that the work of teaching people could have gone on for years. As
you know there's a lot in the Scriptures to teach people and presumably
Saul could have kept going for years and years expounding the Scriptures
to this small church. And it's a natural inclination for churches to want
to hang on to the good ministry they've been receiving. But God had a wider
world in mind. He'd chosen Saul right from the beginning to take the gospel
to the Gentile world. We saw that back in ch 9:15 where we read about his
conversion. And in fact, by the end of this passage that's exactly what
he's driven to, as the Jewish leaders reject his message. But in the meantime
God needs to motivate them to get moving. So he gives them a message through
his Holy Spirit, while they're together at worship, and says "Set apart
Barnabas and Saul for the work to which I have called them." |
| |
Now
before we move on to the second question we need to address today, let me
ask you, does this help us with the question of whether we should still
be sharing the gospel with those of other faiths and other cultures? I think
the answer hinges on what God's desire is for those who haven't heard about
Jesus today. It depends on whether God is still calling people out through
the inspiration of his Holy Spirit to take the gospel to other people. More
importantly, is he still speaking to churches and saying set those apart
for me who have the gifts to do this work? Well, my experience is that that's
exactly what he's doing. What's more, my reading of his word is that the
call to share the gospel is as important now as it was when Jesus first
gave it. When Jesus said to go into all the world, he meant just that. When
he talked about the ends of the earth he was including every area of the
world. That means Namibia where the Prentices are. It means Chile where
the Peters are. But it also means Surrey Hills where we are; or Box Hill
or Blackburn or Balwyn, or Burwood, or Canterbury. Wherever we live or work
or play we'll find people who are still in great need of the salvation that
Jesus offers them. And if you think about it "All the world" is a much larger
group of people today than it was in the first century. So, yes! The call
to share the gospel with people is as great today as it ever was. And the
basis on which we take that gospel to those people is the same as it ever
was. We do it because God commands it. First through the direct command
of Jesus Christ and second through the instructions given by the Holy Spirit
to the Church. |
| |
How
to do Mission? |
| |
But
having said that, we then need to ask, how is this monumental task to be
done? Well, there are a few hints in the passage before us so let's look
at some of the ways Saul and Barnabas went about spreading the gospel in
the wider world. |
| |
A.
By proclaiming the word of God |
| |
Having
been sent out they first go to Cyprus and, being Jews, the first place they
go is to the local synagogues. And notice what they do there: "They proclaimed
the word of God in the synagogues of the Jews." Their first approach was
to proclaim God's word. In their case that meant the Old Testament. Why?
Because in the Old Testament we find the testimony to the coming of the
Messiah. In our case we might want to start with one of the gospels, depending
on how much our hearers know. But the point is that they begin with what
God has revealed about himself already. Later, as we'll see in a moment,
they go on to what's happened in Jerusalem, but their first point of reference
is God's word. |
| |
B.
By demonstrating God's Power |
| |
But
they don't just use words. As we discover in the next encounter, they also
demonstrate the truth of what they're saying by the things they do. As they're
passing through the island they come across a magician. His name's Bar-Jesus
or Elymas in Greek. He's a magician who's been hanging around the proconsul,
Sergius Paulus, no doubt for monetary gain. So he has an interest in keeping
him from being converted. Well, Saul, who we're now told is also called
Paul, isn't going to let a magician stand in his way. First he points out
what he's really doing - "making crooked the straight paths of the Lord."
And then he shows where the real power in the situation lies. Elymas is
struck blind for a time and the onlookers are amazed at this demonstration,
not of magic, but of the power of God that accompanies the preaching of
the gospel. |
| |
Now
it seems to me that we too will be faced by people who will oppose the preaching
of the gospel at a number of levels and in all sorts of ways. They'll do
it for similar reasons to Elymas, perhaps. That is, because the gospel threatens
their livelihood, or their comfortable lifestyle, or their status among
their friends. They use similar methods to oppose us: that is by trying
to undermine our message in the minds of our listeners. And it's easy to
give in to these sorts of pressures. People will try to manipulate us to
tone down the message. They'll try to make out that the message of the gospel
is just our opinion. Then they'll try to make us feel guilty for foisting
our opinions on others when others' opinions are just as valid. |
| |
But
what we see here is that this isn't just our opinion. This is a message
that God has sent to his people; to those whom he's created. And he shows
it's a message from him by backing it up with results. Now I'm not suggesting
that we ask God to strike people blind. I'm not sure that would be a good
thing to do in our particular culture, though it might be in other cultures
around the world. But we can point to the way God works in our lives and
in the lives of Christians we know to do amazing things. |
| |
We
can point out the reality of what people are doing when they lay an emotive
heavy on us. We can point out the fallacy of believing that any worldview
is valid as long as you believe it sincerely. We can point out the emptiness
of people's philosophies of life, of their inability to deal with the real
issues of life in this world; but always with the hope that they'll see
not our wisdom or cleverness, but the power of God that comes through the
message of the gospel. |
| |
C.
By showing how God has worked in the past |
| |
Paul
and his companions then set out for the mainland and when they get to Antioch
in Pisidia we get an expanded version of the way they preach the gospel.
This may be similar to what they did in Cyprus, expounding the word of God,
but here we get perhaps a better idea of just how they went about it. Here
we discover they're not just expounding the Bible. They're actually recounting
the way God has acted over the history of Israel to bring about the salvation
of his people. |
| |
They
begin with God's choosing of Abraham, then the formation of the nation in
Egypt and the Exodus. They move from the settling of Canaan through the
appointment of King Saul, to David the greatest of Israel's Kings, a man
after God's own heart. Now up until this point none of this would have been
new. The congregation would all have been nodding their heads, thinking
how great it was to have this very knowledgeable speaker from Jerusalem
visiting their little synagogue. But then Paul drops the bombshell. God
has now brought one of David's descendants to Israel as a saviour, just
as he promised. He gave testimony to him by the preaching of John the Baptist.
No doubt they all would have heard of John by now. Then he goes on to recount
the events of Jesus' crucifixion: his death, his burial and his resurrection.
For these Jewish believers the good news is this: what God had promised
has now been fulfilled. Jesus is alive. Through him "forgiveness of sins
is proclaimed to you; 39by this Jesus everyone who
believes is set free from all those sins from which you could not be freed
by the law of Moses." And then he gives them a warning that they not fall
into the trap foretold by the prophets, of hearing the good news but rejecting
it. |
| |
D.
By connecting with peoples' own story. |
| |
Now
notice how Paul moves in that speech, from God's word, from the record of
what God has done for them, to their own story, to the events of their own
day. His proclamation of the gospel requires them to get the connection
between God's story and their story, between ancient history and current
events. Of course in their case current events were very closely connected
with God's story. But this is a principle that we need to have clear in
our minds. It's no use just talking about what God has done in the past.
For most people these days anything that happened before Christmas is ancient
history. But neither is it enough to just talk about people's own history.
We're already self-centred enough without reinforcing the tendency. What's
more if we just work from people's own world we'll struggle to find the
resources to cope with the world as it really is. No, we need to make a
connection between what God has done in the past and is doing right now,
and the situation that people find themselves in. |
| |
In
some cases of course that may mean starting from scratch as far as talking
to others about what God has done. These days I generally assume a zero
knowledge base about Christian things among the vast majority of people.
And that means that we need to temper some of this with wisdom about where
to start with people. In fact when we get to Acts 17 we'll see that Paul
takes a quite different approach to the people of Athens whose knowledge
of the Jewish faith would have been limited. But still, we need to connect
people's own stories with the story of God's work in the world. |
| |
E.
By acting according to gospel principles |
| |
But
finally, notice what happens when the Jewish leaders reject Paul's message,
basically out of jealousy. He and Barnabas accept their rejection as a sign
that it's time to take the gospel to the Gentiles. They say: "It was necessary
that the word of God should be spoken first to you. Since you reject it
and judge yourselves to be unworthy of eternal life, we are now turning
to the Gentiles. 47For so the Lord has commanded
us, saying, 'I have set you to be a light for the Gentiles, so that you
may bring salvation to the ends of the earth'" (Is 49:6). In the face of
this opposition they continue to act with integrity and according to gospel
principles. The gospel is a message that was always intended for all people.
God's desire was that the Jewish people would be the agents for taking that
message to the world, but if this part of the Jewish people refuse to accept
it then Paul and Barnabas will do it themselves. And as a result the Gentiles
are brought into the people of God and we read: "48When
the Gentiles heard this, they were glad and praised the word of the Lord;
and as many as had been destined for eternal life became believers. 49Thus
the word of the Lord spread throughout the region." |
| |
So
here's what we discover in this first account of the missionary journeys
of Paul and Barnabas. They go because God sends them, because God's desire
is that all people everywhere should hear about the salvation that comes
through knowing Jesus Christ. And as they go the approach they take, particularly
with those who have a Jewish background, is to proclaim the word of God,
to demonstrate the validity of the message by showing how God is at work
in his messengers, by showing how God has worked in the past, and connecting
that to people's own stories. And overarching it all is a concern to act
according to gospel principles so that everyone who needs to hear the message
gets a chance to hear it. |
| |
We're
still called to preach the gospel to the ends of the earth. That means here
in Surrey Hills as well as in Namibia or Chile. We too can make the connection
between God's story and the stories of our friends or family or work mates.
We might need to think how best to do that, but it's something that God
desires us to do and that each of us is capable of in our own way and at
our own level. So let's pray that God's Spirit, having called us to this
task would enable us to carry it out. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Question for
discussion Acts 13: |
| |
- Of all the teachers in Antioch, why do you think it was only Saul and Barnabas who were sent out as missionaries?
- What is the significance of the setting in which the call to send them out comes?
- Luke summarises their initial approach as "Proclaiming the word of God." What do you think this may have entailed?
- Having seen how Paul demonstrates the power of God to Elymas and Sergius Paulus, think how might we demonstrate the power of God to someone today?
- The account of Paul's speech in Pisidian Antioch expands on how he proclaimed the word of God. What are the significant elements to this proclamation? How might we do something similar today?
- How might we connect God's story to the story of our friends or work mates today?
|